by TPO on November 15, 2014

Gale Minchew

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

 

 

Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin

By

Thomas Jefferson asked for the "the following inscription, & not a word more" on his tombstone: Here was buried Thomas Jefferson Author of the Declaration of American Independence of the Statute of Virginia for religious freedom & Father of the University of Virginia

Thomas Jefferson asked specifically for the “the following inscription, & not a word more” on his tombstone: “Here was buried Thomas Jefferson, Author of the Declaration of American Independence of the Statute of Virginia for religious freedom & Father of the University of Virginia”

“That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practise Christian forbearance, love, and charity toward each other.” – The Virginia Declaration of Rights, adopted by the Virginia Constitutional Convention on June 12, 1776

The founding fathers believed in religious freedom, not religious suppression and persecution. The Library of Congress confirms that “the great majority left Europe [to come to America] to worship God in the way they believed to be correct.” In Europe, “majority religious groups who controlled political power punished dissenters in their midst.” The “New England colonies, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland,” the article continued, “were conceived and established as ‘plantations of religion.’”

While most of the founding fathers were undeniably deeply religious, they also wanted to ensure that the federal government would impose “no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

It is quite unfathomable that their intent has been somehow interpreted over time to mean that all semblance of religion should be removed from the public square. That action, one could reasonably conclude, is suppression of religion, or “prohibiting the free exercise” of religion.

In 2012, Jim Wallis, President Obama’s “spiritual adviser,” said, “It’s not a Christian nation. It’s never been a Christian nation…we set this up so that it would not be a Christian nation for any religious framework.” [emphasis added] Wallis goes to the extreme, ignoring that America was indeed founded with religious – and yes, biblical – principles in mind.

Wallis also referred to the Tea Party as “unbiblical,” but that is another story.

From the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…”

Addicting Info posted a list of 35 quotes “conservative Christians will hate,” which put forward the idea that the government has no business dictating how people should practice their faith. The quotes that were chosen do not confirm a disdain for religion, but a disdain for corruption and religious persecution.

Would the founders approve of the deep anti-Christian sentiment found in America today? It seems that smothering Christianity and bashing the “religious right” would have been deeply offensive to the founding fathers, and indeed, reminiscent of the religious persecution from which their ancestors fled.

The first quote highlighted at Addicting Info was from George Washington, in a letter to the United Baptist Chamber of Virginia, May 1789:

“If I could conceive that the general government might ever be so administered as to render the liberty of conscience insecure, I beg you will be persuaded, that no one would be more zealous than myself to establish effectual barriers against the horrors of spiritual tyranny, and every species of religious persecution.”

It is doubtful that any “conservative Christian” would disagree. The founders did not want to suppress religious sentiment; they wanted to avoid further religious persecution.

The entire quote:

“If I could have entertained the slightest apprehension that the Constitution framed in the Convention, where I had the honor to preside, might possibly endanger the religious rights of any ecclesiastical society, certainly I would never have placed my signature to it; and if I could now conceive that the general government might ever be so administered as to render the liberty of conscience insecure, I beg you will be persuaded that no one would be more zealous than myself to establish effectual barriers against the horrors of spiritual tyranny, and every species of religious persecution. For you, doubtless, remember that I have often expressed my sentiment, that every man, conducting himself as a good citizen, and being accountable to God alone for his religious opinions, ought to be protected in worshipping the Deity according to the dictates of his own conscience.” [emphasis added]

Thanks to the dedicated efforts of the anti-federalists, America’s Bill of Rights was incorporated into the Constitution. The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten Amendments.

The First Amendment to the Constitution is to the point, the part that deals with religion is known as the “establishment clause.”

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The federal government “shall not” choose one religion over another. In fact, Thomas Jefferson’s phrase, “separation of church and state” was addressing that very issue in Connecticut. Literally two days after the letter to the Baptists was written, Jefferson began attending church services in the House of Representatives. If Thomas Jefferson meant that literally there should be no semblance of religion on government property, why did he attend religious services in the executive branch buildings from 1801 to 1809?

Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists ended with a prayer:

“I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.”

The phrase “separation of church and state” does not mean that public buildings are forbidden to display the Ten Commandments, that prayer should be banished from public schools or that a memorial in the shape of a “cross” should be removed from public property.

It means that Congress should “make no law” to designate a state religion, which can lead to religious persecution, which forced “most” to leave Europe for America. It means that Americans are free to practice their religion as they see fit.

The phrase “separation of church and state” is not in the Constitution or any other founding document. It was a phrase in a letter that has been taken out of context and used for political purposes. After the phrase “Separation of Church and State” lay dormant for decades upon decades, it was progressively repackaged by a member of the Ku Klux Klan, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black.

Many of America’s founding fathers were deeply religious. There is no denying that America’s founding documents reflected their faith in God and the founding fathers believed that morality, rooted in religion, was necessary for America to thrive. So if Americans are use the “separation of church and state,” (out of context, as it were) as grounds for shoddy Supreme Court decisions, Americans must then be able to use all of the words written by the founders to justify all sorts of legal decisions.

The truth is that the establishment clause should be enough. The government has no business telling Americans how to worship. Arguably, the governments meddling in marriage and birth control among other things, is unconstitutional. Also, in this author’s opinion, tax-exempt status for churches is unconstitutional. Governments should not have undue influence on teachings of the church.

America was founded as a Religious nation

In his Farewell Address of September 1796, George Washington declared, “[O]f all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.”

Furthermore, he said,

“Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”

John Adams wrote in 1776 that statesmen “may plan and speculate for Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand.”

He continued,

“The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue; and if this cannot be inspired into our people in a greater measure than they have it now, they may change their rulers and the forms of government, but they will not obtain a lasting liberty. They will only exchange tyrants and tyrannies. You cannot, therefore, be more pleasantly or usefully employed than in the way of your profession, pulling down the strong-holds of Satan.”

In 1798, John Adams wrote, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

In 1803, Thomas Jefferson wrote,

“To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others; ascribing to himself every human excellence; & believing he never claimed any other.”

It is doubtful that the founding fathers would agree that people should be forced to pay, through taxes, for things that go against their religious beliefs. Thomas Jefferson also wrote that “to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.”

WallBuilders has a comprehensive list of more quotes on religion by America’s founding fathers.

 

Source

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Video: Catholics Rally Against Satanic Black Mass

August 16, 2016

    Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin By John Ritchie You’ll want to see and share this video about the rally of reparation held in Oklahoma City against the satanic Black Mass. I regret to inform you that yesterday, on the holy Feast of Our Lady’s Assumption, the shameful satanic Black Mass and attack against Our […]

Read the full article →

Atheist Group Goes After Cops For Praying

August 9, 2016

    Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin By Brittany M. Hughes   The absurdly vile and perpetually smug Freedom From Religion Foundation claims to have just given a Florida police chief “constitutional lessons” following a clearly contentious departmental awards ceremony last month. The offending event? It was an awards ceremony for officers, which just happened to be […]

Read the full article →

The Left’s Stealth Religious War: Church Of Liberalism Vs Christianity

July 7, 2016

    Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin By: Lloyd Marcus Much of my wife Mary and my time is spent traveling the country helping to elect conservatives to the House and Senate. I am chairman of the Conservative Campaign Committee. On a rare stop back home in Florida, we decided to enjoy a day at our […]

Read the full article →

SATANIST RUNNING FOR OFFICE IN CALIFORNIA

May 14, 2016

    Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin   By Rodney Pelletier Steve Hill, running for state senate, is a member of the Satanic Temple PALMDALE, Calif. (ChurchMilitant.com) – A self-admitted atheist and organizer for the Satanic Temple in Los Angeles is running for a seat in the California senate. Steve Hill, a stand-up comedian and former […]

Read the full article →

Why the Left Hates Inequality & God

May 4, 2016

    Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin   By TFP Student Action Why is equality so trendy?  On most college campuses you hear about “marriage” equality, income equality, gender equality, and social equality.   What does all this egalitarianism really mean? What is equality? There is a big difference between true equality and egalitarianism.  While true equality […]

Read the full article →

Military Religious Freedom at Stake as Sterling Arguments Approach

April 26, 2016

    The countdown to oral arguments has begun in United States v. Sterling, a case that could drastically alter religious freedom rights of military members Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin On April 27th, the highest court in the military will hear oral arguments in United States v. Sterling, a case that will determine whether military members’ […]

Read the full article →

HOW ISLAM ERASED CHRISTIANITY FROM HISTORY

April 26, 2016

    A lesson that should be familiar to the West. Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin Written by Raymond Ibrahim   Originally published by PJ Media. Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. While Christianity continues to be physically erased from the Middle East, lesser known is that its historical role and […]

Read the full article →

TO SABOTAGE THE FUTURE, LIE ABOUT THE PAST

April 26, 2016

    Northwestern University Scholar Dario Fernandez-Morera tilts at the windmill of the Andalusian Myth – and the myth topples. Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin Written by Danusha V. Goska   I am in awe of The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain. Author Dario Fernandez-Morera, a Northwestern […]

Read the full article →

Satanism as a New Political Movement in America

April 22, 2016

    Submitted by:  Veronica Coffin Written by Dr. Eowyn Did you know that when Barack Obama began his presidency with his mother-in-law (Mooch’s mom) inviting a voodoo priestess to perform a Santeria ceremony in the White House? (See “Under Obama, demons have entered the White House“) It is therefore not surprising that since 2008, […]

Read the full article →